Church & State

  • warning: Creating default object from empty value in /home/jspan/public_html/modules/taxonomy/ on line 33.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/jspan/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_validate() should be compatible with views_handler::options_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/jspan/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/ on line 607.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter::options_submit() should be compatible with views_handler::options_submit($form, &$form_state) in /home/jspan/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/ on line 607.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_handler_filter_boolean_operator::value_validate() should be compatible with views_handler_filter::value_validate($form, &$form_state) in /home/jspan/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/handlers/ on line 159.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_style_default::options() should be compatible with views_object::options() in /home/jspan/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/ on line 24.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_validate() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_validate(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/jspan/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/ on line 134.
  • strict warning: Declaration of views_plugin_row::options_submit() should be compatible with views_plugin::options_submit(&$form, &$form_state) in /home/jspan/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/plugins/ on line 134.
  • strict warning: Non-static method view::load() should not be called statically in /home/jspan/public_html/sites/all/modules/views/views.module on line 906.

JSPAN Urges Supreme Court to Reject Financial Aid to a Church

July 5, 2016 – Ever vigilant to protect the separation of church and state, the Jewish Social Policy Action Network (JSPAN) today submitted a brief to the Supreme Court in support of the State of Missouri, whose constitution contains a “no-aid” clause that prohibits providing public funds to religious institutions

Reflections on Schempp vs. Abington School District -- An Interview with Ted Mann

A new book by NYU professor Stephen D. Solomon, titled "ELLERY'S PROTEST - How One Young Man Defied Tradition and Sparked the Battle over School Prayer," served as the springboard for JSPAN President Jeff Pasek to interview Board Member Ted Mann about his role in Schempp v. School District of Abington Township, the Supreme Court case that outlawed Bible reading in public schools.

Given your central role in the most pivotal church-state case in American history, I was hoping you might answer a few questions. The Schempp case was initiated by the ACLU. How did the ACLU reach a decision to challenge Bible reading in the schools? Ted: Sixteen year old Ellery Schempp wrote a letter to the ACLU's Philadelphia office complaining about the practice. Based on research by Bernard Wolfman (then a lawyer with Wolf Block, later Dean of Penn Law School, and still later a Harvard Law School Professor) who had concluded it was a very close call but that the case might be won, ACLU's Freedom of Expression Committee overwhelmingly decided that the case should be brought. ACLU's Board, on a 10-9 split vote, agreed.

Syndicate content