Economic Justice Policy Center

subcategories:

Minimum Wage | Welfare

Minimum Wage

JSPAN POLICY PAPER - June, 2004

 The Issue   JSPAN Policy  | Experts  | Internet Resources  | Action Items  | Articles  | Myths & Facts

We are taught in Deuteronomy 15:11 that "there will never cease to be needy ones in your land, which is why I command you, open your hand to the poor and needy kinsman in your land."  Though the Torah recognizes that we cannot necessarily eliminate all poverty, we are taught that we must work to alleviate its impact. Making sure the poor are provided for is a responsibility for society as well as for the individual. While we are commanded to give tzedakah and “provide for the poor according to their needs” (Katubot 67b), our tradition also teaches us that it is more important to help a person become self-sufficient than it is to give that person a handout. Maimonides taught that enabling people to support themselves is the highest form of charity. An increase in the minimum wage would allow those in entry-level jobs to be less reliant on federal assistance programs and to become more self-sufficient. An increase in the minimum wage is necessary to restore buying power to minimum wage workers. In addition, it is necessary to link the minimum wage to the annual Consumer Price Index to address the ongoing need to sustain a flexible, realistic minimum wage level, reflective of changing economic conditions. Since passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which established a minimum wage and required Congressional approval for each increase, minimum wage increases have generally failed to keep pace with the rise in consumer prices. Erosion in the real value of the minimum wage has had a serious impact on the standard of living of the working poor. Moreover, erosion in wages of low-wage workers has been a major factor underlying persistent poverty and a steadily widening income gap. The federal minimum wage is currently at $5.15 an hour, and was last increased in 1997. A full-time minimum wage worker earns $10,712 per year, well below the federal poverty threshold of $14,824 for a family of three. Contrary to charges by opponents of an increase, studies have found that a moderate rise in the minimum wage does not reduce employment opportunities or harm small businesses. Economic conditions, not moderate minimum wage increases, determine the level of unemployment, these studies have shown. Further, almost 70 percent of minimum wage workers are adults, contrary to assertions by opponents that most minimum wage workers are teens. Forty percent of the 1997 increase went to families in the bottom 20 percent of the income scale, workers who earn on average $14,000 a year. The federal government has a primary responsibility for alleviating poverty and for ensuring conditions that allow families to move from poverty to economic self-sufficiency. This includes the guarantee of a minimum wage sufficient to allow families to support themselves. The promise of America, and the demand for a decent family life for all, requires prompt passage of legislation to raise the minimum wage.


 Myths & Facts   The Issue  | JSPAN Policy  | Experts  | Internet Resources  | Action Items  | Articles

MYTH: Raising the minimum wage would impact very few people. FACT: An estimated 6.9 million workers (5.8 percent of the workforce) would receive an increase in their hourly wage rate if the minimum wage were increased. Due to "spillover effects," the 10.5 million workers (8.7 percent of the workforce) earning up to a dollar above the minimum would also be likely to benefit from an increase. Single mothers would benefit disproportionately from an increase - this group makes up just 5.7 percent of the total workforce, but represents 10 percent of workers who would be affected by an increase. More than two million married men and women with children under age 18 would also benefit from a hike in the minimum wage. MYTH: An increase in the minimum wage is not an effective way to move people out of poverty. FACT: Wrong! 18 percent of the benefits would go to households with annual incomes less than $10,000, and another 32 percent of the benefits would go to households with annual incomes between $10,000 and $25,000. As welfare reform and welfare-to-work programs push more low income people into the workforce, increasing the minimum wage could play a significant role in ensuring that these people will be able to support their families independently, without cash assistance. Critics of a minimum wage hike often contend that the earned income tax credit is sufficient to assist those in poverty and that raising the minimum wage is superfluous. However, the minimum wage is meant to work in combination with the earned income tax credit and other anti-poverty programs to lift people out of poverty. Alone the earned income credit is insufficient. MYTH: The majority of people earning minimum wage are teenagers and are not the primary breadwinner in their families. FACT: Evidence from the 1996-97 minimum wage increase shows that the average minimum wage worker brings home more than half (54 percent) of his or her family's weekly earnings. Adults (age 20 or older) make up 68 percent of workers whose wages would be raised by a minimum wage increase. One third of these workers are parents of children under age 18, including almost a million single parents. MYTH: Increasing the minimum wage would force small businesses to fire employees. FACT: A 2000 study by the Economic Policy Institute failed to find any systematic, significant job loss associated with the 1996-97 minimum wage increase. These results are similar to other studies of the 1990-91 federal minimum wage increase, as well as to studies of several state minimum wage increases. New economic models that look specifically at low-wage labor markets help explain why there is little evidence of job loss associated with minimum wage increases. This model recognizes that employers may be able to absorb some of the costs of a wage increase through higher productivity, lower recruiting and training costs, decreased absenteeism, and increased worker morale. A 1998 survey of small businesses by the Levy Institute found that fewer than .33 percent reported having reduced employment because of the 1996-97 increases in the minimum wage.

 Action Items   The Issue  | JSPAN Policy  | Experts  | Internet Resources  | Articles  | Myths & Facts

Take Action--Write your Congressional Representative!

 Articles   | The Issue  JSPAN Policy  | Experts  | Internet Resources  | Action Items  | Myths & Facts

Welfare

 JSPAN Policy The Issue | Experts | Internet Resources | Action Items | Articles

Jewish laws and traditions require that we help the needy and poor, whoever they are. According to Maimonides, the highest form of helping others is in ways that make them self-sufficient and preserve the recipient's self-esteem and dignity. Over the past decade there have been many changes to the traditional welfare program in the United States. The alleged goals of these changes were to break the welfare cycle and help make people self-sufficient. These are laudable goals, however they must be tempered by safeguards that protect the needy, they must be coupled with appropriate programs and tools, and those who administer such programs must always show respect for the individual who is being helped. JSPAN therefore calls upon all those involved at all levels of government to include the following features in any program dedicated to helping people trapped in poverty become self sufficient.

  • Fully fund individualized assessments and related services such as training, job placements, counseling, rehab and other support services
  • Make sure that work produces an income where people have dignity
  • Assure that people participating in these programs have continued access to subsidized healthcare, food, housing, etc so as not to penalize them for their achievements
  • Make certain that children are protected
  • Recognize the practical limitations of balancing parenting and work, especially in families with pre-school children
  • Assure that these principles are applied universally in each and all of our United States

These goals are not being met. Too many options are allowed to states. Too little money is provided for assessment and training and related activities. States are told to feed the poor or wean them from welfare, but not given the funding to do both. People are forced to lose their health benefits and other related safety nets before they are self-sufficient. Children and those who cannot care for themselves are placed at risk. We must do better as a nation. As Jews, we must strive for more.

 Experts  The Issue | JSPAN Policy | Internet Resources | Action Items | Articles

 

Comments

Oops! The Jewish Council for

Oops! The Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA)'s resolution in support of a raise in the Federal Minuimum Wage, which can be found online here: www.e-guana.net/organizations/org/ResolutiononMinimumWage.doc {I am reproducing it below. Bear in mind that the figures were relevant when it was passed, back in 1998} And the JCPA's main website is here: www.jewishpublicaffairs.org Resolution on Minimum Wage Adopted by the JCPA Plenum February 23, 1998 Fort Lauderdale, FL Federal legislation, scheduled to be introduced this week, would raise the current federal minimum wage by a modest 50 cents a year for each of the next two years. The Jewish Council for Public Affairs (JCPA) supports adoption of this legislation which would restore buying power to minimum wage workers who have seen their purchasing power fall 30 percent in the last 30 years. Further, the JCPA would support and will advocate for the concept of linking the minimum wage to the annual Consumer Price Index to address the ongoing need to sustain a flexible, realistic minimum wage level, reflective of changing economic conditions. Since passage of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which established a minimum wage and required Congressional approval for each increase, minimum wage increases have generally failed to keep pace with the rise in consumer prices. Erosion in the real value of the minimum wage has had a serious impact on the standard of living of the working poor. Moreover, erosion in wages of low-wage workers has been a major factor underlying persistent poverty and a steadily widening income gap. The current $5.15 per hour minimum wage, incorporating a 90-cent increase in 1996-1997, still leaves the income of a full-time, year round minimum wage worker insufficient to sustain a family of three above the poverty level. Recognizing the correlation between low wages and sustained poverty, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs has long supported efforts to raise the federal minimum wage to levels above the poverty line. Contrary to charges by opponents of an increase, recent studies have found that a moderate rise in the minimum wage does not reduce employment opportunities or harm small businesses. Economic conditions, not moderate minimum wage increases, determine the level of unemployment, these studies have shown. Further, over 70 percent of minimum wage workers are adults, contrary to assertions by opponents that most minimum wage workers are teens. Forty percent of the last increase went to families in the bottom 20 percent of the income scale, workers who earn on average $14,000 a year. The JCPA has long maintained that the federal government has a primary responsibility for alleviating poverty and for ensuring conditions that allow families to move from poverty to economic self-sufficiency. This includes the guarantee of a minimum wage sufficient to allow families to support themselves. The JCPA believes that the promise of America, and the demand for a decent family life for all, requires prompt passage of legislation to raise the minimum wage. -end -